Following Up on PIV Intercourse

Here are a few key takeaways from my recent discussion on the significance of PIV intercourse. While much of this might not be groundbreaking, I found it quite engaging. The feedback was helpful and highlighted that even within the MC niche, there is considerable diversity in how people practice.

1. Perhaps “role” would have been a better focus than “importance,” though most respondents seemed to grasp my intent.
2. I chose PIV as an acronym because it is concise and precise.
3. It appears important to many, but its weight varies across different relationships.
4. Some couples engage in intercourse regularly. I sometimes forget that for some, chastity involves “orgasm control,” while for others, it means “orgasm denial.” Denial has always felt sexy to me, yet MC doesn’t necessarily require long stretches without an orgasm.
5. Others have sex less often, but when they do under MC rules, the encounters feel more special.
6. Then there are those who could easily take or leave intercourse altogether.
7. I suspect PIV is somewhat rarer among older practitioners of MC. In my younger years, frequent intercourse felt like validation for our relationship. Now, with children and careers taking center stage, sex can be a bit more challenging. My wife seems to appreciate the lack of pressure.
8. While my wife may not experience MC as intensely or erotically as I do, she enjoys the perks. She likes that I don’t orgasm elsewhere and isn’t pressured into giving me orgasms herself. This seemed like a recurring theme in the responses.