Chastity and orgasm denial discussion

I first encountered male chastity about a decade back and held the view that it primarily revolved around denying orgasms. That seemed to be its core purpose. But because I naturally question everything, my views have been continuously shifting. Some time ago, I came to realize that most men can reach an orgasm while wearing their chosen device without having to take it off. To give an example, a Hitachi magic wand or a Doxy-style massager easily works through any contraption. The heart beats faster, the body tightens up, and then all the built-up pressure is released. Whether this applies universally across every type of device is something for another thread to debate. But here’s my main point. After watching my partner climax multiple times while he was locked and actively pleasuring me, I started wondering. Some people thought it was disappointing; others hoped I had punished him for it. I felt incredibly empowered each time and confident in my own sexuality. Was that a cause for disappointment or punishment? I didn’t think so. This led me to reconsider the entire concept of denial. I believe it is perfectly acceptable for a man in chastity to orgasm, provided he remains caged. Both caged and ruined orgasms are fine. There you have it—a new guideline for those who need one: Caged orgasms are okay. Remember that while locked, he cannot “take what he wants, rape, get someone pregnant or force himself” upon a woman without her permission. When the orgasm is caged, the sperm goes to waste. It might end up in a tissue, dribble down his leg, or just hang there until it pools on the floor. Feel free to discuss this further, but change is approaching.