member_48af9e1de2 Member Thread starter
I’ve always understood that ruined orgasms are those devoid of manual stimulation, leading to minimal pleasure and post-release satisfaction for men. However, I once read a description that differed slightly: manual stimulation is removed, but only a small amount of fluid comes out without achieving full ejaculation, repeating this process four or five times until the man is completely empty.
I have experienced the first type and believe I’ve had the second one before, though never when fully emptied. I’m curious if anyone with experience in either can answer these questions:
- Which technique does a better job of minimizing pleasure and post-release satisfaction, making it more frustrating for the man?
- For women, how and why do you choose to use ruined orgasms? Do you employ them as punishment instead of full releases? What direct benefits have you noticed since starting this practice?
- It is often suggested that men be restrained while a ruined orgasm occurs. Is this to maintain the man’s submissive feeling or because there is fear he might interfere with the process?
- Are ruined orgasms more effective after days or weeks of chastity, including routine teasing and denial seasons?
Many thanks for any insights you can share.