@L-u-c-y posted a really solid article about ‘Did the Victorians get it right?’ on that community page we reference. It highlights Victorian studies showing how men fare poorly when they indulge in this habit. What I find particularly interesting, and which isn’t highlighted much in the piece, is why these practices impact males one way while having the exact opposite effect on females? Is it physiological or emotional? Or perhaps does higher volume female sexual arousal produce more positive energy than male arousal? During my prime (and by that I mean really going back), I remember post-coital energy for myself as being ‘in my boots,’ whereas my wife’s was through the roof. The Mistress Lucy asks; if Victorian men had access to chastity devices, what wonders of the world would exist today? Well, I think another paradigm fits right in with that idea: a Matriarchal Society combined with males wearing chastity gear? Who knows!
member_6c32ab982b Member Thread starter
Post a reply
More in Technique & practice
- Chastity and orgasm denial discussionmember_3c10f8573c · 2026-09-12T13:39:13.000ZReplies: 02026-09-12T13:39:13.000Z member_3c10f8573c
- Chastity and orgasm denial discussionmember_fed15f1f66 · 2026-09-12T13:37:54.000ZReplies: 02026-09-12T13:37:54.000Z member_fed15f1f66
- Chastity and orgasm denial discussionmember_3312ed8c5a · 2026-09-12T13:24:09.000ZReplies: 02026-09-12T13:24:09.000Z member_3312ed8c5a
- Chastity and orgasm denial discussionmember_536038cd30 · 2026-09-12T13:23:59.000ZReplies: 02026-09-12T13:23:59.000Z member_536038cd30
- Chastity and orgasm denial discussionmember_4cc9a89920 · 2026-09-12T13:17:09.000ZReplies: 02026-09-12T13:17:09.000Z member_4cc9a89920
- Chastity and orgasm denial discussionmember_5acc0673e6 · 2026-09-12T13:12:53.000ZReplies: 02026-09-12T13:12:53.000Z member_5acc0673e6